Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Health Econ ; 32(8): 1659-1669, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2316481

ABSTRACT

We here investigate the role of risk aversion in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. The theoretical effect is ambiguous, as both COVID-19 infection and vaccination side-effects involve probabilistic elements. In large-scale data covering five European countries, we find that vaccine hesitancy falls with risk aversion, so that COVID-19 infection is perceived as involving greater risk than is vaccination.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19/prevention & control , Europe/epidemiology , Vaccination
2.
PLoS One ; 17(12): e0278971, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2197062

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to lifestyle changes across Europe with a likely impact on sleep quality. This investigation considers sleep quality in relation to the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic in five European countries. Using panel regressions and keeping policy responses to COVID-19 constant, we show that an increase in the four-week average daily COVID-19 deaths/100,000 inhabitants (our proxy for the evolution of the pandemic) significantly reduced sleep quality in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Sweden between April 2020 and June 2021. Our results are robust to a battery of sensitivity tests and are larger for women, parents and young adults. Additionally, we show that about half of the reduction in sleep quality caused by the evolution of the pandemic can be attributed to changes in lifestyles, worsened mental health and negative attitudes toward COVID-19 and its management (lower degree of confidence in government, greater fear of being infected). In contrast, changes in one's own infection-status from the SARS-CoV-2 virus or sleep duration are not significant mediators of the relationship between COVID-19-related deaths and sleep quality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Young Adult , Female , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics , Sleep Quality , Europe/epidemiology , European People
3.
J Behav Exp Econ ; 101: 101952, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2086732

ABSTRACT

We analyse a measure of loneliness from a representative sample of German individuals interviewed in both 2017 and at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Both men and women felt lonelier during the COVID-19 pandemic than they did in 2017. The pandemic more than doubled the gender loneliness gap: women were lonelier than men in 2017, and the 2017-2020 rise in loneliness was far larger for women. This rise is mirrored in life-satisfaction scores. Men's life satisfaction changed only little between 2017 and 2020; yet that of women fell dramatically, and sufficiently so to produce a female penalty in life satisfaction. We estimate that almost all of this female penalty is explained by the disproportionate rise in loneliness for women during the COVID-19 pandemic.

4.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 12435, 2022 07 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1947499

ABSTRACT

Understanding what lies behind actual COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is fundamental to help policy makers increase vaccination rates and reach herd immunity. We use June 2021 data from the COME-HERE survey to explore the predictors of actual vaccine hesitancy in France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Spain and Sweden. We estimate a linear-probability model with a rich set of covariates and address issues of common-method variance. 13% of our sample say they do not plan to be vaccinated. Post-Secondary education, home-ownership, having an underlying health condition, and one standard-deviation higher age or income are all associated with lower vaccine hesitancy of 2-4.5% points. Conservative-leaning political attitudes and a one standard-deviation lower degree of confidence in the government increase this probability by 3 and 6% points respectively. Vaccine hesitancy in Spain and Sweden is significantly lower than in the other countries.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vaccination Hesitancy
5.
J Econ Inequal ; 20(2): 503-507, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1826686

ABSTRACT

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1007/s10888-021-09499-2.].

6.
J Econ Inequal ; 19(3): 489-507, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1694414

ABSTRACT

We here use panel data from the COME-HERE survey to track income inequality during COVID-19 in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain. Relative inequality in equivalent household disposable income among individuals changed in a hump-shaped way between January 2020 and January 2021, with an initial rise from January to May 2020 being more than reversed by September 2020. Absolute inequality also fell over this period. Due to the pandemic some households lost more than others, and government compensation schemes were targeted towards the poorest, implying that on average income differences decreased. Generalized Lorenz domination reveals that these distributive changes reduced welfare in Italy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10888-021-09499-2.

7.
Rev Income Wealth ; 68(2): 393-408, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1511386

ABSTRACT

We use data from the COME-HERE longitudinal survey collected by the University of Luxembourg to assess the effects of the policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic on life satisfaction in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and Sweden over the course of 2020. Policy responses are measured by the Stringency Index and the Economic Support Index from the Blavatnik School of Government. Stringency is systematically associated with lower life satisfaction, controlling for the intensity of the pandemic itself. This stringency effect is larger for women, those with weak ties to the labor market, and in richer households. The effect of the Economic Support is never statistically different from zero.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL